As I consider where we are within IC right now and I hear the many discussions across the industry, all that comes to mind is the great opportunity we have to be established and add value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Demonstrating value can be tricky. It has to be clear to leaders, senior management and stakeholders. They need to see the real value of the function and its impact, beyond the tactical work done to help the organization communicate. While practitioners need to be consistent and high performing, balancing both the strategic and the tactical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It can be taken for granted that because communication is important and recognized that leaders\/stakeholders understand the need and purpose for having a professional IC function in place. It can also be assumed that they fully embrace the fact that it is key to enhancing engagement and productivity. But that is not always the case. IC is often the last place leadership head to for advice and answers. And especially when major decisions are being made, like those related to change. IC is often the last to be included. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
ICs challenges haven\u2019t changed \u2013 we are still trying to engage leaders, be relevant and be seen as a strategic function. Some have experienced success, but for many it\u2019s still a struggle. There is a lack of inclusion at the senior level of the business and involvement in its priorities which suggests that as a profession, we haven\u2019t positioned ourselves as an essential business function in the minds of leaders and decision makers. It\u2019s no wonder that some believe there is a threat to the strategic function of IC that in future, might bring into question the role of senior level communicators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the main, these are not necessarily critical problems, we could stay exactly as we are today and do nothing. The only issue is that other disciplines e.g. management consultants will eventually step into the strategic aspects of our role, displacing the requirement for us to speak at this level. These disciplines also offer help to organizations to articulate the vision and create the narrative that we would normally develop to engage employees. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Despite these challenges, there is indeed an opportunity if as professionals we decide to become what businesses and organizations need for these times. They need advisors, agents of engagement and change, people with a strong understanding of the business who will challenge to ensure there is consistency and that ethical behavior is upheld by leadership. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Opportunity not to be missed<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n For us to capitalize on this opportunity we need to become the kind of advisors, leadership can trust and depend on to provide a high level of support. But in the distraction of pandemics, crisis and change \u2013 the focus on getting technology to communicate with remote audiences and the speed at which this is all happening; we might be missing a critical activity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For now, and for the future, leaders and organizations need the support of people who will ensure they maintain their reputation and position of trust as leaders. I believe that the main way that happens is through a reliance on communication expertise that will set them apart as they lead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Research has told us that employees are looking to leaders who can be trusted, are clear on purpose, direction and social issues (Edelman Trust Barometer 2019\/2020). Communicators need to be the catalyst to include these into communication planning and support of leadership through engagement and activities. It\u2019s a call for leaders to stand for something and express that consistently through communication, and having the ability to be genuine, visible and live those values openly. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Reputation and trust can be impacted by having strong ethics and morals and the IC practitioner can play a pivotal role to ensure leaders are not caught out by mixed or contradictory messaging. This goes beyond the creation of propaganda that features the latest trend and a definite opinion and stand on current issues. <\/p>\n\n\n\n I recently read an article by Kasper Ulf Nielsen Chief Strategy Officer, The Reptrak Company \u2013 the reputation monitoring company that highlighted this, he said: \u201c<\/em>Now more than ever, it\u2019s crucial for companies to manage their public ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), perception through effective communications strategies so current and future consumers, employees, and investors alike will view their brands in a positive light\u201d.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The role of IC however challenging is to address behavior, activities and representation that will damage reputation internally. It is not always focused on with employees, but it should be the starting point. Internal and external communication is currently heavily aligned as employees are exposed to the same information as customers. There is no longer a need to censor what internal audiences receive and it is necessary to make sure that things presented externally are shared internally first. The understanding that people need to be respected and included for trust to flourish cannot be understated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So maybe in addition to being the keys to developing reputation and trust, IC practitioners might need to use this time for a bit of reinvention. Perhaps re-presenting the profession to clients and bosses at this time when the attention is heightened, to showcase the value of good communication. Taking the bold step to assert the value with confidence that internal communication can have towards achieving engagement and business success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n